KANT LOVED MUSIC? AESTHETIC JUDGMENTS OF THE EDGING AND PROBLEM OF MODERN MUSIC
Abstract
Music is a kingdom of a sound. How it is philosophically possible to formulate and pro-tect the idea that music can express something in general? Or. How does the separate piece of music transfer the expressive images, messages? Or. What does the esthetic es-sence of music consist in? Perhaps, these questions are intended for reflection. Especially as philosophers and musicians think of music differently. Philosophers try to formulate the theory according to which it is possible to speak accurately and consistently about music as about a communication form. Their reasonings, as a rule, abstract, and not al-ways allow some concreteness. Musicians are those who just assume, and are convinced that music can "create and express". Thus, musicians often become impatient concerning problems of philosophers, thinking that they are removed from the music. Philosophers, see unsteadiness of a thought, uncertainty in judgments of musicians.
And, nevertheless, many philosophers were interested in music, trying to formulate a consecutive theoretical system in which musical analysts could consider the questions and answers. Immanuel Kant was one of such philosophers.
Kant as the philosopher, saw the task in reconciling science and art with religion. In this article reflection is offered whether "loved music?" An edging and as its esthetic judg-ments of music and what value its judgments on modern musical culture have today were formed.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Русский)References
Адорно Теодор В. Избранное: Социология музыки. (Культурология. XX век). М.: Университетская книга, 1999. 445 с.
Болотов Л. Т. В Кёнигсберге. Из записок Андрея Тимофеевича Болотова, написанных самим им для потомков. Калининград, Книжное издательство. 1990. 191 с. 3. Болл Филипп. Музыкальный инстинкт. Как работает музыка и почему мы не можем прожить без неё и дня. Изд. Бомбора ТМ. Москва. 2021. 431с. 4. Боэций А.М.С. Основы музыки. Издательство: Научно-издательский центр "Москов-ская консерватория", 2012. 448 с.
Вольфинг. Модернизм и музыка. Издательство «Мусагет». М. 1912. 451 с. 6. Гулыга А. В. Кант. Серия ЖЗЛ. изд. «Молодая гвардия», Москва, 1981, 304 с.
Кант И. Сочинения: В 6 т. Т. 6. М., 1966.
Кроненберг М. Философия Канта и ее значение в истории развития мысли. Калинин-град, 2005. Кант и Кёнигсберг .236 с.
Кузнецова И. С. Иммануил Кант и музыка//Кант и Кёнигсберг. РГУ им. И. Канта, Калининград, 2005. С. 220 -236
Сакмаров И. О. Современная музыка. На пути к новой классике. Издание второе, сте-реотипное. Лань «Планета музыки». Санкт-Петербург – Москва – Краснодар. 2020. 133 с.
REFERENCES
Adorno Teodor V. Izbrannoe: Sociologiya muzyki. (Kul'turologiya. XX vek). M.: Universi-tetskaya kniga, 1999. 445 s.
Bolotov L. T. V Kyonigsberge. Iz zapisok Andreya Timofeevicha Bolotova, napisannyh samim im dlya potomkov. Kaliningrad, Knizhnoe izdatel'stvo. 1990. 191 s.
Boll Filipp. Muzykal'nyj instinkt. Kak rabotaet muzyka i pochemu my ne mozhem prozhit' bez neyo i dnya. Izd. Bombora TM. Moskva. 2021. 431s.
Boecij A.M.S. Osnovy muzyki. Izdatel'stvo: Nauchno-izdatel'skij centr "Moskovskaya kon-servatoriya", 2012. 448 S.
Vol'fing. Modernizm i muzyka. Izd- vo «Musaget». M. 1912.. 451 s.
Gulyga A. V. Kant. Seriya ZHZL. izd. «Molodaya gvardiya», Moskva, 1981,304 s.
Kant I. Sochineniya: V 6 t. T. 6. M., 1966.
Kronenberg M. Filosofiya Kanta i ee znachenie v istorii razvitiya mysli. Kaliningrad, 2005. Kant i Kyonigsberg. 236 s.
Kuznecova I. S. Immanuil Kant i muzyka//Kant i Kyonigsberg. RGU im. I. Kanta, Kalinin-grad, 2005. S. 220 -236
Sakmarov I. O. Sovremennaya muzyka. Na puti k novoj klassike. Izdanie vtoroe, stereotip-noe. Lan' «Planeta muzyki». Sankt-Peterburg – Moskva – Krasnodar. 2020. 133 s.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31312/2310-1245-2021-49-23-35
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 I. B. Hmyrova-Pruel
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.