NOTEWORTHY AS BASIS OF AESTHETIC ATTITUDE

А. Е. Радеев

Abstract


The article proposes to consider a classic problem of aesthetic theory — what is the an aesthetic attitude — with new point of view. In contrast to previous traditions in aesthetics that treat aesthetic attitude through disinterestedness, a special attitude to the object or through social relations, the author puts forward the hypothesis that it is noteworthy that underlies the aesthetic attitude. Also the author defends the idea that aesthetic experience is not a momentary one, but a process consisting of certain aspects, one of which is an aesthetic attitude.

Keywords


aesthetic attitude, aesthetic experience, disinterestedness, multiplicity, R. Ingarden

References


Герцен А. И. Избранные произведения. Т. 3. Былое и думы. Части 1-5. М.: Терра-

Книжный клуб, 2009. 380 с.

Пушкин А. С. Полное собрание сочинений. Т. VIII. М.: Воскресенье, 1997. 450 с.

Радеев А. Е. Homo Aestheticus и эстетическая теория // Концептуализация Homo

Aestheticus. Часть 1. История и рефлексия. Коллективная монография. / Сост. и общ.

научн. ред.: Б.Г.Соколов. СПб, Изд-во РХГА, 2015. С.69-99.

Dickie G. The Myth of the Aesthetic Attitude // American Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 1, No.

(Jan., 1964). P. 56-65.

Feezell R. H. The Aesthetic Attitude Debate: Some Remarks on Saxena, Coleman and a Phenomenological

Approach to the Issue // Philosophy East and West, Vol. 30, No. 1 (Jan., 1980).

P. 87-90.

Ingarden R. Aesthetic Experience and Aesthetic Object // Philosophy and Phenomenological

Research. Vol 21. No 3 (Mar., 1961). Pp. 289-313

TRANSLIT

Herzen A. I. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. Т. 3. Byloe I dumy. Chasti 1-5. М.: Terra-Knizhny club,

380 p.

Pushkin A. S. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii. Т. VIII. М.: Voskresinie, 1997. 450 p.

Radeev A. E. Homo Aestheticus i esteticheskaya teoriya // Konceptualizaciya Homo

Aestheticus. Chast 1. Istoriya I refleksiya. Kollrktivnaya monografiya. / Sost. i obsh. nauch. red.:

B.G.Sokolov. SPb, Izd-vo RHGA, 2015. P. 69-99.

Dickie G. The Myth of the Aesthetic Attitude // American Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 1, No.

(Jan., 1964). P. 56-65.

Feezell R. H. The Aesthetic Attitude Debate: Some Remarks on Saxena, Coleman and a Phenomenological

Approach to the Issue // Philosophy East and West, Vol. 30, No. 1 (Jan., 1980).

P. 87-90.

Ingarden R. Aesthetic Experience and Aesthetic Object // Philosophy and Phenomenological

Research. Vol 21. No 3 (Mar., 1961). Pp. 289-313


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Studia Culturae